d21 > News > Can we interest you in any missile components today?

Can we interest you in any missile components today?

Added on 17/03/2008

Student protests across the country are putting pressure on top universities to reconsider their investment portfolios. Eleanor Paton reports...

Students across the UK have been campaigning against universities’ financial investments in the arms trade. Protesters campaigned at many Russell Group universities, including University College London.
At UCL students dressed up as arms dealers and sold fake weapons in the main quad. This was to draw attention to the £800,000 of shares that the university has in Cobham Plc, who develop and support defense systems. The protests were organised by Campaign Against the Arms Trade (CAAT) along with the student pressure group People and Planet. CAAT is a broad coalition of groups and individuals in the UK that aims to end the international arms trade.

Universities invest in the arms trade for a variety of reasons. Firstly, the increase in defence budgets since the ‘war on terror’ has meant more business for the arms companies, causing their share prices to have risen. Simultaneously the funding problems in education mean that universities feel the pressing need to make money through investments.
Secondly, the top universities in the UK receive funding for research from arms companies so the relationship between the university and the arms company becomes a two-way one. Thirdly, to invest in the arms trade is in fact common practice for higher education institutions – there are currently 45 universities in the UK that do so; therefore the investment seems vindicated because it is a part of the status quo.
In addition to this some universities relinquish the control of their investments to another party, thus distancing themselves from ethical responsibility. Durham’s own endowment funds are invested in a pooled fund. The treasurer’s section of the university explained: “The nature of such a fund is that we do not invest directly in companies and we have not received any information giving details of the number of shares held by the fund in which we are invested. The UK equity fund in which we invest is managed by JP Morgan Fleming and is known as the Fledgling UK Equity fund.”

These protests last week formed a part of the wider University Clean Investment Campaign, run by CAAT, which seeks to “alert students and staff to the investment decisions which are being made by the financial officers of their colleges and universities; give them the tools so that they can hold them to account; and help break the links between arms companies and higher education.”

The campaign emphasises the value of ethical investment, stressing that it too can be economically viable. CAAT argues that ethical investment funds that exclude arms company shares are some of the most profitable. In the last ten years the Church of England’s £4.3 billion ethically managed fund was the second best performer out of more than 1,000 funds.

The University Clean Investment Campaign began in 2005 after a national study showed that 45 per cent of the institutions for which the information could be acquired were significant investors in the arms trade. The campaign seemed was predicted to be an uphill struggle, with fears that campus protest regarding universities’ investments in the arms trade would be suppressed. For instance Lancaster University prosecuted six students who protested peacefully at a “corporate venturing” conference which was promoting commercial links between the university's research and arms company BAE Systems. However since its establishment the campaign has had some successes, including The School of Oriental and African Studies and Goldsmiths University of London who sold their arms investments.

Due to student pressure St. Andrews has adopted an ethical investment policy and Manchester University has sold many of its shares in BAE systems and Rolls Royce. In addition to this student unions across the country have passed ethical investment motions suggesting that students resent the link between their institutions and the arms trade.

Eleanor Paton

All images © their respective owners

Comments for "Can we interest you in any missile components today?"

  1. I thought it was odd too but as I was making a freedom of information request when I sent the email I assumed that they would be telling me all they were supposed to. It seems to be quite difficult to get information on Durham, even CAAT didn't know where the university invested.
    El
    23/03/2008 22:12
  2. What's most interesting is the treasurer's apparent ignorance of the investments held by JP Morgan on behalf of the university. How did that get past the audit if no testable breakdown was available? I am an auditor, and know that investment banks have to disclose, on request, details of the shareholdings to the entity (in this case, the university) and its advisors (e.g. layers, auditors, regulators). Unless PwC have been negligent (which wouldn't be anything new) then they must have done work with the treasurer at the annual audit to verify the valuation. If the treasurer insists that there is no record of where the university's money is invested, then it might be worth making a Freedom of Information request simultaneously to the university, JP Morgan and PwC.
    Si
    23/03/2008 11:44
  3. really interesting article.
    Anon.
    21/03/2008 15:03
  4. Oops, I am a dumb girlie! Though I'm probably not as embarrassed as the first Anon at 13.47 who posted a comment with as many holes as an Emmenthal. Lucky it was anonymous!
    Charlotte
    19/03/2008 14:42
  5. Charlotte. Leaving aside the non-weapons side of AWE, the clue is in the name.
    Anon
    18/03/2008 21:34
  6. I really don't see why students shouldn't campaign against companies just because they're graduate employers. And I don't see why there's an irony in student unions having different policies from universities.

    Which is probably why you chose to post that anonymously.
    Charlotte
    18/03/2008 16:08
  7. Thank goodness for that picture which really illustrated the good work of those white, middle class students standing up against huge employers and trainers of graduates like BAE systems.

    During periods of possibly approaching economic downturn, the defence industry is often seen as a safe place for a [in this case: mutual] fund to drop some liquidity. The University probably also owns part of tobacco companies too.

    This makes the irony of our fairtrade student union even more delicious.
    Anon
    18/03/2008 13:47
  8. "Cobham Plc, who develop and support defense systems"

    "Manchester University has sold many of its shares in BAE systems and Rolls Royce"

    I'm a little confused - what exactly is meant by the 'arms trade' here?

    I really hope for the sake of humanity that these campaigns are not based on the principle 'all companies that deal in weapons are evil'.
    Chris
    18/03/2008 08:05
  9. This reminds me of the Careers Advisory Service email sent round last year from the Atomic Weapons Establishment. It didn't seem to mention that a career in AWE would mean having to build weapons!

    Maybe selling off arms investments is declaring a political position, but investing in arms is also a political position, so universities need to decide where they stand on this.
    Charlotte
    18/03/2008 00:07

Add your comment

Get Involved!

Share on facebook Send to a friend Write for durham21